WTW
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company$249.67
+1.76%Live · FMPMay 29, 2026
Market cap
$23.58B
52w range
240.61 – 352.79
P / E
—
EPS
—
Volume
880.46K
Revenue · FY
$9.71B
-2.24% YoY
Overview
Discounted cash flow
Income / accounting-based
Multiples & assets
Scenario
Toolbox
Weighted blend
$261.80
+4.86% vs spot
Hold
Spot price
$249.67
Mkt cap $23.58B
subtle cardAnalyst PT consensus
$338.42
+35.55% vs spot
subtle cardMethods covered
19 / 20
9 in blend
subtle cardFootball field
WTW · fair-value range by method
Method comparison
WTW · fair value by valuation framework
| Method | Category | Fair value | Range | vs spot | Weight | Driver | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF · FCFF | dcf | $841.04 | $533.61 – $1,494.90 | +236.86% | 6.0% | WACC 4.9%, g₀=12.5%, gₗ=2.0% | high |
| DCF · FCFE | dcf | $489.81 | $350.49 – $722.93 | +96.18% | 11.9% | kₑ 6.5%, g₀=12.5%, gₗ=2.0% | high |
| DDM · Gordon | ddm | $84.20 | $68.84 – $108.39 | -66.28% | 11.9% | D₁ 3.70, kₑ 6.5%, gₗ 2.0% | med |
| DDM · H-model | ddm | $127.53 | $94.14 – $180.11 | -48.92% | — | D₀ 3.70, g₀=12.5%, gₗ=2.0%, H 5y | med |
| DDM · multi-stage | ddm | $106.83 | $90.81 – $122.86 | -57.21% | 11.9% | 5y schedule 12.5% → 2.0%, kₑ 6.5% | high |
| Residual income | income | $111.41 | $98.04 – $124.78 | -55.38% | 21.4% | BV 83.18, ROE 19.9% → kₑ | high |
| EVA / MVA | income | $851.77 | $749.56 – $953.98 | +241.16% | 7.1% | IC 11.8B, WACC 4.9% | high |
| Excess returns | income | $135.39 | $119.14 – $151.63 | -45.77% | 14.3% | BV 83.18, ROE 19.9% | high |
| P/E · sector | multiple | $227.64 | $200.32 – $254.96 | -8.82% | 9.5% | EPS 16.26 × peer P/E 14.0 | med |
| P/S · sector | multiple | $300.88 | $255.75 – $346.01 | +20.51% | — | Rev/sh 100.29 × peer P/S 3.00 | med |
| EV / EBITDA | multiple | $237.39 | $208.91 – $265.88 | -4.92% | — | EBITDA × peer 10.0× − ND 3.8B | high |
| EV / EBIT | multiple | $237.99 | $202.29 – $273.69 | -4.68% | — | EBIT × peer 12.0× − ND | med |
| EV / Sales | multiple | $216.79 | $184.27 – $249.31 | -13.17% | — | Sales × peer 2.55× − ND | med |
| PEG-anchored | multiple | $328.30 | $279.06 – $377.55 | +31.49% | — | PEG=1, fwd EPS g 20.2% | med |
| Earnings power | intrinsic | $352.32 | $310.04 – $394.59 | +41.11% | — | NOPAT / WACC, no growth | med |
| Graham revised | intrinsic | $537.32 | $456.72 – $617.92 | +115.21% | — | EPS×(8.5+2g)·4.4/Y | low |
| Lynch P/E=g | intrinsic | $203.22 | $172.74 – $233.70 | -18.60% | — | PE = g (12.5) | low |
| Book NAV | asset | $83.18 | $79.03 – $87.34 | -66.68% | 6.0% | (Assets − Liabilities) / Shares | high |
| Liquidation | asset | $1.37 | $1.16 – $1.58 | -99.45% | — | Cash 100% + non-cash 70% − Liab. | low |
| Reverse DCF | reverse | — | — | — | — | Implied g -12.2% · Pessimistic — market pricing decline | high |
Cost-of-capital build-up
CAPM cost of equity, after-tax cost of debt, WACC. Risk-free as of 2026-05-12.
| Risk-free rate (US 10y Treasury)rf | 4.46% |
| Equity beta (0.45)β | × 0.45 |
| Equity risk premiumERP | 4.46% |
| Cost of equity (CAPM)kₑ | 6.48% |
| Pre-tax cost of debtkd | 3.77% |
| Effective tax ratet | 16.1% |
| After-tax cost of debt | 3.16% |
| Equity weight$8.1B | 53.8% |
| Debt weight$6.9B | 46.2% |
| WACC | 4.95% |
Growth assumptions
Blended forward growth used as DCF default; terminal pegged to long-run nominal GDP.
| Analyst forward revenue growthFMP | 7.32% |
| Analyst forward EPS growthFMP | 20.19% |
| Historical 5y revenue CAGRFY | 1.92% |
| Historical 5y EPS CAGRFY | 2.95% |
| Sustainable g (ROE × retention)Δ | 15.49% |
| Blended near-term growth (g₀) | 12.50% |
| Terminal growth (gₗ) | 2.00% |
Sources
- FMP /analyst-estimates— 8 rows(as of 2021-12-30)
- Treasury rates · 10y— 4.46% rf(as of 2026-05-12)
- market_risk_premium · DB— 4.46% ERP(as of 2026-05-13)
- Sector multiple defaults— Financial Services (live sector PE unavailable)
- FMP /price-target-consensus— mean $338.42
This page is generated by a quantitative valuation engine for research purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Methodology follows standard CFA / Damodaran frameworks; assumptions are driven by analyst consensus from Financial Modeling Prep and reported financial statements.